Normal gender identity is again under attack, this time with attempts in both Canada and the United States to twist children’s minds into accepting drag queens and transvestite behavior as normal.
Sadly, these attempts to expose young children to overtly sexual adult drag queens is happening in such locations as public libraries and schools. Even worse, some parents are now pushing their prepubescent children into performing in sexually-charged drag shows for adult men,
When the drag-themed Werq the World tour arrived in Montreal, an 8-year-old “drag queen” who goes by the name Lactatia was ready, with the support of his parents to perform an erotic dance for a cheering crowd of adult men.
When questioned by reporters, the boy told them, “If you want to be a drag queen and your parents don’t let you, you need new parents. If you want to be a drag queen and your friends don’t let you, you need new friends.”
What is more, with the new child abuse law passed in Canada just this year, Lactatia’s parents could lose custody for questioning his decision, let alone preventing him from becoming a drag queen.
With terrible irony, questioning the transgender movement can now be considered a forum of child abuse in Canada. In this case, he started performing when he was only seven, with the active encouragement of his mother who does his makeup for every show.
How such a public demonstration of not only transgender performance but also pedophilia earns praise for the sexual exploitation of an eight-year-old is an indication of how far Canada has slipped towards the abyss.
One LGBTQ publication, The Advocate, enthusiastically reported that Lactatia was “looking like a living porcelain doll” and that he “received a trophy as his parents beamed”.
Canada is not alone when it comes to exposing children to sexually explicit transgender performances, however. School District 4 (including Public School 96, Public School 83 and River East Elementary School) in Manhattan recently held its so-called Learning Expo on May 25th at the Museo del Barrio.
Much of the event was devoted to showcasing the standard talents of elementary-aged children, talents ranging from piano playing and gymnastics to magic tricks and singing.
The two hundred gathered families were entertained by the innocent displays of their children until the President of the Public School 96 Parent Association, Frankie Quinones, closed the event with a highly explicit drag queen performance that had dozens of parents rushing to usher their children out.
Children as young as five years old were subjected to views of the middle-aged Quinones gyrating on stage in drag, showing his g-string underwear and moving his tongue suggestively to mimic perverted sexual behaviors.
Raquel Morales, a parent attending with her fifth-grade son, told reporters that “People were horrified. It looked like a nightclub performance. I’ve been asking for an apology from the district for the last week, and they’ve been ignoring it.”
Quinones’ act, which he delivered in a black dress, was kept as a “special surprise performance” until the end of the show. Responding to the lip-synched song from Iris Chacón, one upset parent said, “I left the show the minute he started sticking his tongue out.
I had my children with me and I wasn’t going to allow them to see that.” School officials have not, according to an Education Department statement, faced disciplinary actions over the act that even their spokesperson now admits was “inappropriate”.
As if child exploitation or exposing children to erotic dancing by adult drag queens weren’t enough, the Brooklyn Public Library in Park Slope now has what it is calling “Drag Queen Story Hour”.
Not an isolated incident but instead a program designed by Michelle Tea of Radar Productions, the classes are running in several other cities as well, to include San Francisco and Los Angeles.
The DQSH features a caste of drag queens who read books on homosexuality and non-conformity with gender norms to young children not yet old enough to read.
Its website explains that it aims to “capture the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models.”
In other words, they are trying to subvert traditional notions of gender at an age when children are most vulnerable and are still trying to understand these roles.
On a recent Saturday, a drag queen who goes by “Lil Hot Mess” sat in a dress covered in rainbow stickers and read the book “Worm Loves Worm”, a book on homosexual acceptance that has a title that leaves little doubt as to its message. The reading was followed by a drag-themed dance and sing along.
One horrified parent asked, “Why on earth would you expose impressionable minds to someone who is obviously mentally confused? We should be reinforcing gender identity and not adding to the chaos of this very mixed-up world.”
Yet Park Slope is not the only NYC location to feature the event which is now starting up at the Aguilar Branch Library, the New York Public Library, the Tompkins Square Library, and the Hudson Park Library in the city.
Transgendered child sexual exploitation, pornography masquerading as talent and now explicit indoctrination of elementary-aged children are a direct threat to the proper development of our children.
Promoting normal gender behavior is now being called abuse and public institutions in both the US and Canada actively work to legitimize transgender behavior at a very young age.
The next generation has already clearly been conditioned to accept such behavior.
A poll was recently done to measure young millennials attitudes to the issue. The question posed to young Americans: should the government “remove children from homes where the parents refuse to provide resources for gender transition?”
The question didn’t include an age restriction for the kids. You may want to sit down for this:
Fully 18 percent of the 1,402 respondents answered yes; another 27 percent said they were unsure. Among female respondents, a majority stated that children should either be removed from the home (21 percent), or they were unsure (33 percent).
A whopping 60 percent of Clinton voters felt the same way; just seven percent of those who voted for Trump said yes, and 15 percent said they were unsure.
Among self-described liberals, 47 percent said they were either in favor of government removal (10 percent) or unsure about it (37 percent).