Category Archives: Health

The Transgender Battle

The transgender subject has become increasingly a hot topic in the news and now in our schools — elementary schools no less!! Worse, transgenderism is now becoming a ‘relevant’ topic in the medical field — the ignoring of science is becoming more common place.

Parents of children are those who are responsible for their child. Until the child is an adult, it is the parent who must make ‘adult’ decisions for their offspring.  The majority of parents believe their child is ‘developing’ not only physically, but mentally during their youth.  However, there is a great deal of effort being expended by the very few who are trying to sell the public on the idea that the child has no idea what they are or, the child is sure they’re the opposite of what their ‘jeans’ are telling them — a confusing thinking at best itself.

How often do you hear medical (i.e., scientific information) related to you on this subject?  If your answer is very little, or you have a child who is on the ‘border line’ of indecision, you should watch the video below.  This lecture is presented by Dr. Quentin Van Meter, MD, FCP who is a pediatric endocrinologist with 42 years of medical experience.  His objective is to bring to the public’s attention relevant information regarding child development with respect to their sexual identity.

The video is 41 minutes long and has a great deal of relevant and enlightening information in it (with very little chatter).  Understanding it is a longer video, if you’re in a hurry, skip to the 15 minute mark. (The first 15 minutes basically lays down historically a foundation for the talk.)  That 15 minute mark however is where the very relevant information comes on fast.  At the 25 minute mark the speaker goes into the 2009 Endocrine Society’s (a largely non-professional organization) guidelines for assessing a patient with respect to their sexual identity.  (The more political part of his lecture.)  This is where the objectives (of the left) become very clear.  The speaker points out the end objective of the left is to create a much larger ‘gay’ society in America, and subsequently the world, through the perversion of scientific analysis.  The end state being the  normalizing of the homosexual segment of our country.  (Tolerating them is no longer acceptable, accepting their lifestyle is not enough, now we need to ‘celebrate it’.)

Toward the end of his lecture, he discusses a more recent presentation having been given in Austin, Texas in 2016 (the liberal capital of Texas).  At that conference there were only those who supported the notion that children must be directed on their sexual path in life.  Opposing views were not allowed at the conference.  (Dr. Van Meter attempted to get on their agenda but was refused without explanation.

Our society is at war with itself. At a minimum, parents should be informed and responsible with the life they’ve been gifted. Watching this video should focus the viewer’s attention on the more scientific view of the subject.  We must become a more responsible society if we wish to survive.

 

Source: CRTXNews

Advertisements

Suicide in America — A Loss of Hope

During the 50’s we had to worry about nuclear war because of our relationship with the Russians.  (de ja vue?)  Kids were being training to hide under their desks while in school in case of a nuclear attack..?!  Sounds nuts, huh?

Well today we have a LOT of things to worry about and the count keeps increasing.  In recent years there has been a growing lack of trust in our country (between individuals), and people are feeling it.  Consequently suicides are up — a lot!  How much you ask?  A simple clue is that Americans’ overall life expectancy has declined for the first time since the 1930s!!  (i.e., the depression)  Certainly not good.

The following article was taken from Breakpoint, a Christian website which promotes a better life through faith.  Something that more people should consider.  But, unfortunately there are fewer real Christians in this country every year rather than more.

BreakPoint: America’s Suicide Crisis

If you have an interest in psychology and/or you are a pastor in a church, you should also read the following more detailed report written by a psychologist.  A bit longer, but worth reading — I’m sure you’ll find it worthwhile doing so.

Dying of Despair

My question are:  What can we as individuals do to help the situation (beside taking care of ourselves and not being a further burden on society).  And, where is this all going to lead in the near future..?  My guess is that if we stay on our current track, we’re going to be in big trouble!!?

 

 


 

America’s Suicide Crisis

There’s a great deal happening in this country and to it, all of which is very disheartening.  People are growing weary of the various crazy things happening starting with our ‘fundamental transformation’ under the last administration.

Many may know that among other groups in America, military personnel are currently committing suicide at a rate of “22 per day”!  We could go into the reasons, but I’ll save that for another day.  The following article is a brief synopsis of a longer one written by a psychologist — which is very interesting.  I’d suggest reading at least the shorter one below.

America’s Suicide Crisis

Dying of Despair

 

It would seem, at least to me, that our country’s citizens are becoming to a boiling point.  Once they become enraged enough, they stop reflecting on themselves and start getting mad at others.  Based on news reports today, it would seem that we are getting close…?

 

 


 

 

Plan-B — Republican’s Insurance Plan

So is it a good thing?  Personally I’m not sure — I don’t trust Ryan to start.  And, the republicans have become democrat light over the last few decades.  So where does that put us?  I think you know.

But here’s an article that gave me a different slant on the insurance game.  From it, I get that we’ll get ‘the hose’ no matter which direction we go..?


 

Mauldin Economics

March 7, 2017

Why Interstate Health Insurance Won’t Fix Obamacare

By Patrick Watson

Congress has a new healthcare plan to replace Obamacare. It may go nowhere since many Republicans aren’t happy with it… and the problems it tries to solve will remain.

Worse, anything that gets past the House and Senate may not matter if insurers refuse to play in 2018. The big ones haven’t committed yet.

If the new plan doesn’t fly and Obamacare collapses, as seems likely, what’s Plan C?

President Trump listed several ideas in his speech to Congress last week. Among them was this:

The time has come to give Americans the freedom to purchase health insurance across state lines—which will create a truly competitive national marketplace that will bring costs way down and provide far better care.

That sounds practical and conservative. Just reduce regulations, and the free market will provide.

Often, that’s true. This time, it’s not.

To find out what the problem is, look no further than a deal Citibank made with South Dakota 37 years ago.

Credit Card Loophole

When you read the fine print on one of your credit cards, you’ll likely see the issuer is a bank in South Dakota. It might be Delaware or Nevada, but probably South Dakota.

Why are the big banks issuing credit cards through South Dakota subsidiaries?

Back in 1980, with both inflation and interest rates at double-digit levels, banks were getting squeezed on credit card loans. State usury laws capped the interest rates they could charge borrowers, but not the banks’ own cost of funds.

Legendary Citibank Chairman Walter Wriston found a loophole. A 1978 Supreme Court ruling said banks could set consumer loan interest rates based on the state in which the bank was located, instead of the borrower’s state.


Photo: Getty Images

Wriston had been asking New York legislators to raise the usury limit so New York-based Citi could charge higher rates nationwide.

When they refused, he looked for friendlier politicians… and found them in South Dakota.

Wriston called then-Governor Bill Janklow with a generous offer. Here’s how a Frontline documentary described it.

In an effort to stimulate the local economy, South Dakota was in the midst of eliminating its usury laws. Mr. Wriston told Mr. Janklow that if South Dakota would quickly pass a bill inviting Citibank into the state, he would bring 400 jobs. To preempt concerns from local banks about new competition, Citibank also promised to open only “a limited” bank. “We’ll put the facility in an inconvenient place for customers and we’ll pay different interest rates,” Mr. Wriston recalled telling Mr. Janklow. “All we want to do is use it to issue cards.”

For Mr. Janklow, it was an easy decision.

“To me, this wasn’t a credit card deal, it was a jobs deal,” he said. “It was an economic opportunity for the state. I was slowly bleeding to death.”

With bipartisan support and backing from South Dakota’s banking association, Janklow proposed a special “emergency” bill. “Citibank actually drafted the legislation,” he said. “Literally we introduced it, and it passed our legislature in one day.”

The arrangement ultimately brought 3,000 high-paying jobs to South Dakota and a host of new suitors from banks across the country.

That’s why your credit cards come from South Dakota. Citibank literally picked its own regulator and wrote its own law. Delaware and Nevada later made similar moves, but South Dakota was first.

The result wasn’t all bad. Today, credit cards are widely available in every state. Your interest rate may be higher and your spending limit lower if you have poor credit, but you can probably get a card.

If you think enabling more Americans to take on more debt is a good idea, we have the perfect system to do it. But what we don’t have is competition between states.

In theory, banks in any state can issue credit cards. But good luck getting one that isn’t from South Dakota, Delaware, or Nevada. Those are the choices the banks give us.


Photo: Getty Images

Separate Risk Pools

A state-based national market for credit cards isn’t exactly the same as one for health insurance, but it’s similar in some ways.

Instead of usury limits, insurance companies face state laws mandating certain benefits that raise costs and reduce profits. They’re one reason health insurance premiums are higher in some states.

So if we let insurers sell health coverage across state lines, people can bypass all that and buy in a state whose insurers best suit their needs. Sounds great, right?

The problem is that health insurers will likely do what the banks do with credit cards: congregate in whichever state lets them do what they want—which is to insure only healthy people.

The result, within a couple of years, will be separated risk pools. Young, healthy consumers will buy stripped-down, low-priced policies from states that allow them, while older, sicker people all cluster in the few states willing to cover them at a reasonable cost—if any will.

Sound familiar? Something like that is why Obamacare isn’t working.

This is where the credit card analogy breaks down. No one has to have a credit card. You won’t die without one. But everyone will get sick or have an accident sooner or later.

There’s another problem: Providing health insurance isn’t as simple as just mailing someone a card and billing them every month. The insurer has to deliver care locally, wherever the customer lives. Building hospital and doctor networks is expensive.

Five states—Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, Rhode Island, and Wyoming—already did what President Trump suggests. They’ve opened their borders to insurers from other states.

Has it worked? Have insurers from other states rushed into these wide-open markets?

No, they haven’t. So erasing the state lines may not be as helpful as proponents think.


Photo: Getty Images

Insurance ≠ Care

Politicians choose their words carefully when they talk about this. They’ll often say everyone should have “access to health insurance.”

Sounds nice, but it misses a few things.

Access to health insurance is not the same as access to health care. People are learning that the hard way right now.

In many parts of the country, Obamacare plans come with deductibles of $5,000 or more. So you’re covered only after you’ve spent $5,000 that you probably don’t have.

Median household income in the US is only around $56,000. Median means half of all household incomes are below that amount, and few people have an extra $5,000 sitting around. They’re insured, yes, but they can’t afford to use their insurance even if tax credits cover the premiums.

So Obamacare isn’t the solution, because it’s not working either.

But interstate insurance is no cure. At best, it will leave us with the same problems Obamacare hasn’t solved. It might even make them worse.

I wrote last year how our healthcare system suppresses job creation and undermines economic growth. We need a better solution.

We know what doesn’t work. We need to find out what does.

See you at the top,

Patrick Watson

Abortion vs. Surgical Miracle

‘Children’ not yet born are apparently worthless based on progressive rhetoric.  Killing a ‘fetus’ is of no consequence.  Life is meaningless..?  Kind of like in third world countries — typically communist states.

Well here in America we all haven’t drunk the ‘progressive coolaid’.  The following article describes medical activity today which is simply amazing.  And, it reaffirms the value of life here in America…   so far.

Surgery Before Birth

Isn’t it great to read for a change something positive happening in this world!!?


Our Children and Digital Addiction

Much like the article I just posted on ‘Avery’ (National Geographic & Gender), this article is yet another example of how the progressive movement is trying to destroy our culture in America.  If you don’t think our kids are under assault, read the following article and think again.  All of this in the interest of making our kids ‘better’..?

Kids turn violent as parents battle ‘digital heroin’ addiction

 

This is information that should be shared with everyone you know who has kids!  A friend of mine is who turned me onto this subject.  His son who was a 3.8 GPA student all through an advance high school is now a 2.0 student and physically attacking his parents (who are great people!).  Yet another life destroyed, at least for now.  Hopefully he’ll turn around..?


National Geographic & Gender

This world is getting sicker every year.  And personally, I believe it is by plan.  America must be made weaker in order for it to no longer be the leader of the world.  If it were not for America’s strong Christian morals and values, this world (in my opinion) would be in even worse chaos than it is today.

Children today are being programmed to think the way the ‘feel gooders’ want them to, not ‘how to’ think.  And National Geographic is doing their best to help twist the thinking of America along with the progressive movement.  (I can’t wait to hear the comments on this article.!?)

National Geographic on Gender

And in ‘her’ own words, hear Avery’s story.

Avery Jackson

I have to ask, who’s more messed up?  A child four years old or parents who are more interested in their ‘acceptance level’ than they are about their own child’s welfare??!  Pretty sick stuff…